Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (15801)	3/31/2010 1:41:56 PM
From: Alighieri	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42652

This bill didn't go far enough to cut costs, as you well know. I don't dispute that. Thanks to conservatives once again for vehemently opposing the public option. Al

To: RetiredNow who wrote (15801)	3/31/2010 2:15:36 PM
From: Sdgla	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

Didnt go far enough ? In what reality will costs go down when you increase demand and supply goes down ? There is no progress in a world where government programs, SS MC DMV USPS, all are costing taxpayers billions of $$'s and the response from the current admin is to install yet another Trillion $ entitlement program. Thanks for the response re premiums MM. Your answer is they will not be going down but thats progress right ? A reality does not exist where government entitlements are the solution to a pre existing set of entitlements that are already bankrupting this country. Agree ?