To: scion who wrote (288 ) 4/15/2010 12:01:35 PM From: scion Respond to of 53574 If Islechem had actually tested a catalyst and released the data we could see for ourselves exactly how much the "secret catalyst" improves efficiency. Posted by: SteveF Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010 11:48:41 AM In reply to: stumiller who wrote msg# 37654 Post # of 37659 Remember the catalyst not only dramatically improves the quality of the fuel output, but the speed of the process too. That's materially false. Catalysts can only speed up the reaction, not alter the output. If Islechem had actually tested a catalyst and released the data we could see for ourselves exactly how much the "secret catalyst" improves efficiency. But for some reason JBII wishes to keep that data secret. I wonder why that is? Nobody can steal the catalyst technology from Islechem's efficiency numbers. The stock would skyrocket if an Islechem report was released showing the difference between a run using the normal Donghe machine versus one including the catalyst. Seems like common sense that such a test was done. Again, I have to wonder why they don't want you knowing the results..siliconinvestor.com Posted by: stumiller Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010 11:40:36 AM In reply to: SteveF who wrote msg# 37640 Post # of 37659 You're way off there Steve. Blest themselves say that the output contains "contains gasoline, kerosene, diesel oil, and heavy oil". youtube.com Quote: It sounds like they simply tested the Blest/Donghe machine as-is. Also, on a per-volume basis, Blest's machines cost 8000% more than JBI's. Here's their price list: Remember the catalyst not only dramatically improves the quality of the fuel output, but the speed of the process too. siliconinvestor.com Stu