Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 1Coffeehound who wrote (296)	4/15/2010 4:01:00 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

Now that the Islechem report has fizzled, the next big thing that's going to get JBII moonbound is the NY permits - but they were already supposed to have those, weren't they? LOL. Message 26444968

To: 1Coffeehound who wrote (296)	4/15/2010 4:26:46 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

Good grief, one would expect that after his extensive pumping of the failed USSE and Rivera's "secret catalyst" that Zardiw would have a clue about what a catalyst does. Posted by: SteveF Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010 11:48:41 AM In reply to: stumiller who wrote msg# 37654 Post # of 37734 Remember the catalyst not only dramatically improves the quality of the fuel output, but the speed of the process too. That's materially false. Catalysts can only speed up the reaction, not alter the output. If Islechem had actually tested a catalyst and released the data we could see for ourselves exactly how much the "secret catalyst" improves efficiency. But for some reason JBII wishes to keep that data secret. I wonder why that is? Nobody can steal the catalyst technology from Islechem's efficiency numbers. The stock would skyrocket if an Islechem report was released showing the difference between a run using the normal Donghe machine versus one including the catalyst. Seems like common sense that such a test was done. Again, I have to wonder why they don't want you knowing the results.. siliconinvestor.com Posted by: zardiw Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010 3:52:30 PM In reply to: SteveF who wrote msg# 37656 Post # of 37731 Well that's totally WRONG...lololol. ANY chemist will tell you that the output depends on the catalyst. You see there are MANY catalysts......and they do different things......easy to forget/not know/miss/ignore that tiny itty bitty factoid........z siliconinvestor.com Chemistry Glossary Definition of Catalyst By Anne Marie Helmenstine, Ph.D., Definition: A subtance that increases the rate of a chemical reaction by reducing the activation energy, but which is left unchanged by the reaction. Examples: A piece of platinum foil is a catalyst for the combustion of methane in air.