SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (136741)4/16/2010 12:13:22 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543356
 
The Future of Capitalism - Profits and Growth
Posted by Gail the Actuary on April 16, 2010 - 9:50amGrowth Feasibility

==
Growth is only possible when energy flow is increasing.
It is pretty simple really. When energy flow is increasing in each subsequent time period it is possible to increase the amount of work devoted to increasing the asset base of society. Alternatively, if the energy flow is decreasing...
==
An Uncomfortable Conclusion
The conclusion is not comfortable but is imperative. Capitalism, as it has been practiced in a market and democratic governance system, is going to die. It will die in one of two ways. Either people will start to exercise some rationality and some wisdom and realize that as the energy supplies diminish the capacity to do useful work also diminishes. They will then seek to reorganize our governance structures/institutions in such a way as to rationally respond to the reality. Somehow I have a hard time seeing this kind of response. From outright denial, to outright insistence on exceptionalism and blind faith in market mechanisms, I suspect that most people will be blind-sided by reality.

Message 26466486



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (136741)4/16/2010 7:38:16 PM
From: Bread Upon The Water  Respond to of 543356
 
I see, you mean to insinuate yourself to the President!



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (136741)4/16/2010 8:31:50 PM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 543356
 
<<<A Justice with a medical background would be a good thing.>>>

A Justice with any other background would be a good thing. Acquiring a solid medical, science, or engineering background is much more difficult. It is not all that difficult to go from medical, science, and engineering into law but going the other way is near impossible. Just look at Scalia and his attitudes toward the hard sciences.