SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (361121)4/24/2010 6:23:57 PM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 794187
 
Never heard of Adam Kokesh, but Jim Bunning has endorsed Rand Paul, for whatever that's worth...

edit: Kokesh doesn't appear to be a nut like Alex Jones. The worst thing an opponent might say about him is he was involved with Iraq Veterans Against the War.
en.wikipedia.org
kokeshforcongress.com



To: KLP who wrote (361121)4/24/2010 9:01:24 PM
From: Nadine Carroll15 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 794187
 
I want Sarah Palin for head of the RNC -- right now!



To: KLP who wrote (361121)4/24/2010 9:05:50 PM
From: MrLucky5 Recommendations  Respond to of 794187
 
What I find most interesting is the vast number of people who have decided she isn't presidential material when a loser like Obama was placed into office. To my knowledge, she has yet to declare herself a candidate for the job. It is all speculation by people who don't have a clue about the job and what it actually entails.

What this tells me is that many, many people in this country are worried that she might actually run and win. No one, except her, really knows. I have never seen so many articles loaded with criticism about a person who has not announced intentions for the office. Even Hillary Clinton did not get this amount of negative coverage.

Yes, she has endorsed some people who I believe are weak candidates, such as McCain and Paul's kid. she also endorsed people like Brown and Bachmann and West plus others.

The reality is that she is a target which columnists like to talk about even though they fail to demonstrate scope in their analysis.



To: KLP who wrote (361121)4/25/2010 12:38:29 PM
From: D. Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794187
 
Whatever her reasoning, it was an imprudent and reckless endorsement given her stature

So... what's the big deal?