Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (91212)	4/27/2010 12:54:50 PM
From: matherandlowell	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197217

"And people who disagree with you are not heretics, to have their motives attacked. It serves no purpose, gathering firewood to burn me at the stake. Your righteous anger just blinds you to this company's faults" I don't know about the other guys, but I feel much more enlightened having read your comments-- released in a way from the religious burden that seemed to be growing within me. You should know that I have just placed a huge order to buy QCOM at $25/share. Huge order. How did you find out that I was gathering the firewood? j.

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (91212)	4/27/2010 1:14:52 PM
From: waitwatchwander	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197217

With a PE of 14, plus cash in the range of $12 per share, 2010 GAAP eps of $2 and locked in forward growth of 14%, a $38 share price is reasonable. It will probably trade at $33 and change before the likes of value investors like yourself take the plunge though. Reason: Casino folks eventually get tired of constantly beating their drums, and just like you, they see the value and the need to get out and about. ps If your looking for real truth, you might want to try the other thread.

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (91212)	4/27/2010 1:57:32 PM
From: Dash of Reality	6 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197217

Your righteous anger just blinds you to this company's faults My righteous anger? I am not angry about the company's faults. There is no "denial" on my part. My problem with your statement stems from the fact you point out these faults as if those who are invested or those currently investing in this stock are blind to them and therefore, making a mistake. Then in the same blog state your intent to purchase when you and others finally finished condemning management and the stock value reaches your desired entry point of $35. Another Truth: when this stock bottoms, it will be because value investors like me start buying. One could also state that this stock will bottom when people stop manipulating the price because traders like you stop trashing the stock. I asked earlier, for posters on this board to state their Fair Value for QCOM, with their reasoning. Do you have a guess, which you can back up with numbers from the 10-K and 10-Q? The Fair Value for QCOM is in the eye of the beholder. I can not predict where this stock is headed, however, I am confident it is positioned well for the future. Those traders who feel they can predict the appropriate entry and exit point for a stock are not investing they are riding a wave of manipulation enhanced by talking head's fear mongering. DoR