Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (565027)	5/6/2010 8:12:28 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578036

Ted, > Then why do you support the AZ law? A consistent rule of law has to be maintained. If we don't want to enforce immigration law, then we should just open up the borders and give legal residency to anyone who asks. You are suggesting that the choice is the AZ law or chaos. However, that's not true. There are several other options.....like sueing the fed. gov't instead of passing a law that is blatantly racist and only making things worse. Ignoring the less fortunate only hurts that social order. The less fortunate are not ignored in a limited government. Their rights and freedoms are secured by the Constitution just like everyone else's. My undestanding is that your idea of limited gov't essentially ignores the plight of the less unfortunate. Is that my misunderstanding? And if so, what would you offer the less fortunate under a limited gov't? You still need to figure out the difference between "free as in speech" and "free as in beer." Huh? Why should I try to understand something that doesn't make much sense.