Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (4684)	5/11/2010 9:10:29 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

<No, what I posted is correct - your embrace of ID makes > But I don't embrace "ID"... I've never even read it. As I stated and you ignored.. {as usual}. Again, as I asked... and you ignored... do YOU "embrace" it? <Nobody knowledgeable thinks that anymore.> Right. Making your point incorrect (that it's current dogma).... which you've shown by your inability to show ONE biologist saying such. <But let's not imply they're consciously reasoning. Unless you have evidence of that.> Those are words everyone, including scientists, need to define: "concious reasoning" for example, but intelligence and all that as well. "Evidence"? Here's one inside you: youtube.com <Cells, otoh, maybe they do fit the robot paradigm better. If you have evidence otherwise, I'm open to it.> Or we could say... if you have evidence cells are robotic, I"M open to it! DAK