SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (77650)6/7/2010 2:04:29 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 149317
 
Maybe they could have mobilized a task force with skimmers, mops, buckets, straw and garbage bags. Military and prisoners maybe even volunteers, even people on unemployment benefits?

Where are the people of the panhandle? Why are they not out there protecting their beaches?



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (77650)6/7/2010 4:06:43 PM
From: ChinuSFO  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
I do not know of any surfer who could ride a tsunami wave. Until we have one, surmising that mopping activities would be productive during such a high gush rate is far fetched.



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (77650)6/7/2010 5:46:38 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
That is exactly what they should be doing. Just a few days ago CNN reported that flying over the gusher and looking at 500 to a 1,000 sq miles of oiled water, there were exactly 12 skimmers.

That is ridiculous!! There should be many more. A 10 year old kid could make that deduction.

>>RE:"And the Feds had what equipment and expertise immediately available that they would have deployed compared to what BP did?"

Maybe they could have commandeered a couple of empty tankers to vacuum it up at sea. At the spill site. Maybe they could have prepared to seal off critical inlets.

Maybe they could have mobilized a task force with skimmers, mops, buckets, straw and garbage bags. Military and prisoners maybe even volunteers, even people on unemployment benefits?

Much more at stake here than sending Lawyers and "making BP pay".

I guess their is a wide gulf between suers and doers?



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (77650)6/7/2010 11:10:03 PM
From: Dale Baker  Respond to of 149317
 
Maybe they could have commandeered a couple of empty tankers to vacuum it up at sea. At the spill site.

Since the oil was welling out 5000 feet lower than that much faster than anyone could skim it up, that's a moot point at best.

No one has any real solutions beyond what has been tried, just general grousing or "Go nuke it!" nonsense.

The whole debate has become nonsensical.