Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (570863)	6/8/2010 6:14:30 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578299

"Fact is no one knows what to do about the ones here already - but obviously it will have to be some sort of compromise between kick'em all out and total amnesty." See, I KNOW that certain members of your team insist on "kick'em all out". One member of your team is for kicking out children born here to illegal parents, RETROACTIVELY! My own take is, crack down HARD on employers, leave them with NO jobs, let them "deport" themselves and only after a year of that, adopt the remainder. No border closing necessary.

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (570863)	6/8/2010 6:32:07 PM
From: Elmer Phud	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578299

I disagree with that policy. There are millions of educated Asians, Middle Easterners, Europeans etc who are denied immigration status, so why should they be denied while we instead allow in a class of people who are already over represented and on the whole are less educated? A case could be made that it is racist to insist that our immigration quota be filled by a single class of people at the exclusion of other equally, if not more deserving nationalities just because they aren't Latinos.