Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (571690)	6/14/2010 10:36:48 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575765

"Yes Whales and Buffalo have had reason to be placed under protection as endangered species. Lots of animals and plants do. So you could label that an age which was (when there were plenty)... an age which is gone if you want. But that was not the context of the point you were responding too. Maybe you never got it, which would not surprise me" Maybe oil should be placed under protection.....but you missed the simpler point...... When you over consume, you deplete the sources.... simple, No?? "he stone age didn't end because we ran out of stones and the age of petroleum wont end because we run out of petroleum. However, while it is one of the best energy sources we've got to get our needs met, we will continue using it." The stone age analogy is stupid.... but when we run out of petroleum the petroleum age (as we know it) won't end?????? Smart usage would give us decades of additional time to find alternatives...