Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (572044)	6/16/2010 6:10:03 PM
From: Elmer Phud	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575767

tejek - Thanks for the article. It's a good read and both sides need to be heard to make good decisions. Too bad I can't link to the content of the books I reference that dispute these claims but if you're interested, here are some names: The Environmental Case for Nuclear Power Power to save the world. A Brighter Tomorrow. Also, I frequently listen to Dr Bill Wattenburg PhD Nuclear Physics and Professor, University of California. He does a weekend radio show out of San Francisco Saturday and Sunday nights on 810AM. He goes into great depth on all of the issues discussed in your referenced article. He is a scientist, not a journalist. Here's some interesting food for thought. The coal fired plants we are forced to use as an alternative to nuclear power plants dump 100,000s of thousands of tons of Uranium and Thorium directly into the atmosphere for us all to breath. ornl.gov This is so we will be safe from the non existent radiation from nuclear power plants.