SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (572807)6/21/2010 1:32:46 PM
From: Bill2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577995
 
Shaking down companies is not what our govt should be doing.

If a company doesn't cough up what they owe to an aggrieved party, the courts are the proper venue to resolve it.



To: tejek who wrote (572807)6/21/2010 2:18:03 PM
From: HPilot  Respond to of 1577995
 
if they're not convincing Bill O'Reilly, they're probably not convincing many.

O'Reilly has always been a fence sitting moderate, ocassionaly getting off the right side of the fence. So he holds little sway with conservatives.



To: tejek who wrote (572807)6/21/2010 2:20:30 PM
From: i-node3 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1577995
 
>> EVEN O'REILLY ISN'T BUYING THE 'SHAKEDOWN' LINE....

I know it is a hard concept for you to understand, but I don't take marching orders from O'Reilly or anyone else. O'Reilly has tried to give Obama the benefit of the doubt, often far beyond what is reasonable.

Simply put, O'Reilly is frequently wrong WRT Obama.

The question here is whether an entity is "shaken down" when that entity has already committed to making the payment. And I don't know the answer. To what extent did the threat of criminal prosecution play a role? BP clearly has shown no hesitation to spend the money it takes to solve the problem -- 2 billion and counting thus far.

It doesn't matter. Obama is grossly incompetent and continues to show it on a daily basis.



To: tejek who wrote (572807)6/21/2010 2:45:24 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1577995
 
Ted, I too have a problem with the "shakedown" label. Usually that is reserved for the actions of lawyers going after small businesses for minor infractions.

What BP did wasn't a "minor infraction," nor is the impact negligible. Obama needs to secure the funds from BP, because litigation would be a b!tch for both sides.

Tenchusatsu