SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (87185)7/7/2010 4:01:19 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 224749
 
"The past 10 years is the warmest 10 years of any decade on recod."

yes because the scammers lowered the past temperatures. and I say the temps in the next ten years will be higher. It's easy when you lower past temps



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (87185)7/7/2010 4:04:00 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 224749
 
look at how they take the temp readings now.

Message 26533426



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (87185)7/7/2010 4:27:24 PM
From: chartseer  Respond to of 224749
 
oh bummer! You were just saying 1998 2005 2010 were the hottest years on record which isn't true. Now you the very same person wants us to believe the past 10 years were the warmest decade ever recorded. There again the warmest temperatures on record were recorded in 1913 and 1922. Once again using plain logic i will say I would rather believe the decade from 1913 through 1922 when the all time record warmest temperatures still to this day are the warmest temperatures ever recorded was warmer. Now should i believe logic over someone who only posts false phoney propaganda statements to advance a illegitimate unwanted harmful agenda?

Don't worry! Be happy!

the stupid hopeless comrade chartseer in the new era of spreading false and phoney propaganda to forward an illegitimate unwanted harmful agenda



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (87185)7/7/2010 4:47:51 PM
From: Ann Corrigan2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224749
 
Weather changes are analyzed by centuries not decades. More Lib shortsightedness.