Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (259460)	7/9/2010 7:20:03 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

I hardly think those are the worst, but those are three he could have accomplished with simple presidential orders. BUSH could have done all three in a day. He didn't. Why not? WAS he lying? If not, why didn't he do those simple things? Why doesn't he tell us why he didn't? Choose.....Bush heavy or Obama. That's the choice. If you think Obama is about to take away your freedoms, then go for Bush heavy. Then you won't ever have to think about it again.

To: bentway who wrote (259460)	7/10/2010 12:17:36 AM
From: Elroy Jetson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

When a person becomes President they're provided briefings of classified information which informs their opinions differently. This information is controlled and molded by the permanent government employees who lead each President along their desired perspective to their desired decisions. If you were to decide differently, these permanent employees are well connected to make serious problems for your administration, as many Presidents have discovered. The government of England of the 1700s was run by the King, who in turn was a captive of his Privy Council. Things have changed little. .