Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (575835)	7/10/2010 1:17:27 PM
From: d[-_-]b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572953

But, at the base of the problem are STILL the employers. True nuff - but if the city provides real documentation - how is an employer to know? We already have a bunch of libtards upset a cop might ask immigration status - yet you insist employers should do it and they have no database of criminal/immigration history to tap into. I would say the sanctuary cities are the worst. Any form of assistance - especially real identification is just criminal. Everyone expects the state/city to play by the laws. Not to mention the civil rights act and fair employment act - these employers will get sued if they start "profiling" - so they simply trust the states/cities documentation as golden. The feds failed to stop their entry in to the country and once in you have cities aiding and abetting criminal behaviour. The employer may be hiring illegals on purpose but many are not - the documentation the illegals present assumes status has been verified by none other than government themselves.