SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (575842)7/10/2010 1:38:46 PM
From: d[-_-]b  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1573766
 
But the AZ law says clearly they only ask status if the person is detained for some other crime first. This would help to establish what we do with them - pay for their jail cell or deport them and save some money.

Employers can also be sued by legal aliens making the claim of racial profiling if they fail to get the job even if based on a lack of qualifications.

Employers do not have an obligation to enforce immigration - the feds do - you just show your big business hatred and socialist ideals placing all blame on them.



To: bentway who wrote (575842)7/10/2010 2:02:58 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Respond to of 1573766
 
Employers profiling is okay and so is cop profiling - especially when they're dealing with criminal suspects. Who would be against determining the legal status of criminal suspects? Liberals, thats who.