Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (575947)	7/12/2010 9:33:54 AM
From: Alighieri	1 Recommendation Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1571973

It jumped by 3.4 percent, while they enjoyed a 12 percent increase in their income. So in rough terms they paid 28% on their extra 12% income...pretty un-progressive i should say...and it's unclear what the 28% means...fed taxes only, or total tax burden? Meanwhile what he fails to say is that the gap between rich and poor continues to grow. He also fails to say that the bush tax cuts, which were "designed" to spur growth, culminated in the biggest economic fiasco in decades, set up the debt situation to explode as we are witnessing today, and nearly brought the country to a depression...one obama is trying to fix in a cacophony of cat calls from republicans. It's all very vague by design, me thinks, because the Heritage foundation doesn't have a good story to tell for policies they have been advocating. Al