Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (24870)	11/7/1997 7:22:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

CHARTERS: Recognize the words below? You ought to, you wrote them. From the rag that you sell to unsuspecting idiots. "They do have an orebody." Yeah, Charters, if the ore is salt. Your DD on Bre-X is worth about as much as your DD on IPM. Zip, nada, squat, zilch, null, ought. "Bre-X and Bresea... nice price eh?.... well I'd wait for more news and adjustments before making a very conservative investment. Watch CDN Juniors in this area. New Guinea/Indonesia is for real and the mining is cheap. By law their Stock cannot support over $40.00 But they do have an orebody. And it will just get bigger and bigger. They have miles of strike. But will they support $60.00 ? On spec maybe.. a few big holes. A good metallurgical report.. rumours of a favourable financing..." BXM ASE BXM DOUBLED SINCE THIS ANNOUNCEMENT. IT MAY DOUBLE AGAIN.

To: E. Charters who wrote (24870)	11/7/1997 7:25:00 PM
From: Wildcat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Please explain, if IPM is a scam, why Bateman Engineering would want to associate with them? As I recall Bateman was not sought out but they requested a "look see" and then they decided to aid in determining/proving the viability of a economical mine. Wildcat