SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (18425)7/22/2010 10:42:17 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
"The next burst of ideological energy -- massive regulation of the energy economy, federalizing higher education and "comprehensive" immigration reform (i.e., amnesty) -- will require a second mandate, meaning reelection in 2012."

I don't see where you find "loony left" in that. There was a Republican president the last time we did amnesty and a Republican president federalized primary and secondary schools. Certainly neither could be described as socialist. Not sure what will be done with the energy economy so I can't evaluate that one but I seriously doubt it will be socialized, which is the only thing I can think of to do with it that would be in loony territory.



To: i-node who wrote (18425)7/22/2010 10:50:35 AM
From: skinowski  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
For Obama, 2010 matters little. If Democrats lose control of one or both houses, Obama will probably have an easier time in 2012

That's right - allow the other side some room for reaction, and then get re-elected riding the counter-reaction.

Almost hard to imagine that those strategists are so smart, but they probably are. When it comes to money and power and ego trips, people will surprise you how far they can think.



To: i-node who wrote (18425)7/22/2010 1:35:58 PM
From: dybdahl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
Since those who have the highest potential for delivering tax money are usually also those who can least afford to pay for health care, there is a certain economic benefit from the changes. Has anyone calculated how big that is?