Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Donner Minerals (DML.V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Terry J. Crebs who wrote (898)	11/7/1997 8:10:00 PM
From: Terence Mitchell	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 11676

Hi Terry, your "Geologically educated" opinion does not bear well with most of us I'm sure. I for one wouldn't be as sure as yourself, after all I'm significantly older and have had some of my youthful assertions wrung out of me by sustained exposure and subsequent experience. Perhaps you should write down your current views and revisit them let's say 20 or 30 years from now. The reason I say this is that you sound very "textbookish", perhaps it's time to think beyond what is written regards, Terence (Terry) Mitchell

To: Terry J. Crebs who wrote (898)	11/10/1997 3:13:00 PM
From: VAUGHN	Respond to of 11676

Hello Terry Thanks, to Wayn & Jim as well. I am hardley qualified to talk, and I certainly don't have all the geological data behind me that the VP of Teck had when he made those statements, but from what I have read so far, I would tend to agree with you, VB & SVB do seem more like one another than Sudbury. I also understand that there is a theory that Sudbury's deposit may have originated with a meteor strike which would seem to be unlikely in VB. An interesting read though, as was Kent's post. Regards PS. Some posts are starting to take shots fellas, its been friendly disagreement so far, I hope we can all keep it that way. Food for thought. Have a good one.