Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SmoothSail who wrote (374364)	7/22/2010 3:03:53 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793955

it's interesting to see who benefitted from all of this. It looks like Breitbart was snookered. But who snookered him? Probably not the NAACP since they look like idiots with their kneejerk response. Obviously not the Dept of Ag....kneejerk reactionary idiots just like the NAACP. Not Fox News since they were late to the party and still got blamed. Interesting that Shirley thinks that she might have a case against Breitbart. Where I still didn't like how he handled it, he simply posted Shirley Sherrod in her own words. There is no defamation there. If creative editing becomes an actionable offense, the liberals are going to be in some serious trouble. And they would have to prove that Breitbart did the editing. If he posted what he received as he stated, he doesn't have a thing to be worried about.