SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (22050)7/23/2010 11:03:43 AM
From: Eric  Respond to of 86356
 
Kinks in the Ethanol Message-Machine?

(click on link below to see video)

The ethanol industry is feverishly lobbying lawmakers in an effort to hang onto billions of dollars in subsidies that are set to expire — although there appears to be some discord on the message front.

Growth Energy, a leading ethanol industry association, threw some fuel makers for a loop last week by suggesting that they would be willing to trade tax credits for incentives aimed at making more cars and more gas stations ethanol-ready.

From The Associated Press last week:

One industry group, Growth Energy, made the bold move Thursday of calling for the tax credits to be phased out completely in favor of spending the money on more flex-fuel cars and gasoline pumps that support ethanol. A rival group, the Renewable Fuels Association, said it’s too late in the year to make such proposals — the tax credits expire at the end of the year, and legislative days are numbered.

But there also seems to be some lack of unity within Growth Energy itself on the topic of tariffs on imported ethanol.

The Brazilian Sugarcane Industry Association, which naturally abhors the tariffs, was only too keen to point out the apparent discrepancy in a YouTube video published on Wednesday and embedded above for your viewing pleasure.

The quick summary: Growth Energy’s co-chairman, Jeff Broin, appeared to support the idea of ending or perhaps lowering tariffs on ethanol imported from other countries — so long as those countries provided reciprocal treatment for American ethanol entering their markets.

Fast forward to Wednesday, when Wesley Clark, also a co-chairman of Growth Energy, appeared to say the opposite in testimony before the Senate Agriculture Committee.

We are not sure who is on-message and who is off-message here, but look for more wrangling as the House Ways and Means Committee revisits a variety of energy tax credits beginning next week.

5:02 p.m. | Updated

A spokesman for Growth Energy, Chris Thorne, reached out to deliver this clarification of the group’s position:

In fact, what Jeff Broin and General Clark state are not exclusive — the tariff ought to be tied to the value of the tax credit, and if the tax credit is slowly phased out, then the tariff can be as well. The tariff is in place so foreign energy producers are not able to take unfair advantage of the U.S. tax credit, especially when so many foreign producers already enjoy preferential tax treatment, market supports and other subsidies in their own countries.

To restate: Growth Energy’s position is that as long as there is a tax credit in place, the tariff should remain. We believe that we can phase out the tax credit in the long run, if those funds are redirected toward building out infrastructure (i.e., blender pumps and Flex Fuel Vehicles) to open the market to fuels that can compete with oil.

green.blogs.nytimes.com



To: Road Walker who wrote (22050)7/23/2010 11:27:35 AM
From: Eric  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 86356
 
My wife's sister and her daughter are flying down from Seattle to visit some relatives in Panama City, Florida for a week. And what she said to me a few days ago pretty well summed up the concern of tourists going to the affected areas in the gulf and surrounding areas.

"I'm not about to let my 9 year old daughter anywhere near the water if there is any oil present.. even if I smell it. If it's there we are turning around and heading home."

Pretty well sums up the problem in the tourist business down there sadly. I told her my opinion which in my personal experience with oil spills over the years.... just stay away.

Eric



To: Road Walker who wrote (22050)7/23/2010 11:44:25 AM
From: Eric  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86356
 
Wind: The Blue-Collar Renewable

What makes a wind turbine? Steel, gears, cement and other stuff that will keep plenty of welders and pipefitters busy.

It might surprise the futurists and environmental activists who support renewable energy to find out that the renewable manufacturing industries, according to a number of studies, create as many -- if not more -- blue-collar, boots-on-the-ground jobs as the fossil fuels industry. In 2009, the number of wind industry workers -- many in manufacturing, heavy transport and factory assembly -- surpassed the total number of workers in coal mining for the first time.

At a recent press conference, the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) joined with leaders from the United Steelworkers and members of the BlueGreen Alliance to announce the release of Winds Of Change, a new report that describes the 18,500 manufacturing jobs now provided by the wind energy industry and the seven times as many manufacturing jobs that could materialize in the next five years from a wind industry supported by policies such as a Renewable Electricity Standard (RES) requiring regulated U.S. utilities to obtain 25 percent of their power from renewable sources by 2025.

"The expansion of the wind industry, if we do it right, has the ability to revitalize American manufacturing," said Jason Walsh, the Director of Policy for the BlueGreen Alliance, a coalition of labor unions, including the United Steelworkers, and environmental groups, like the Sierra Club.

"A typical wind turbine has 8,000 component parts and 250 tons of steel," Walsh said. "It won't be a handful of scientists and engineers who build this green economy," Walsh said. "It's going to be pipefitters and machinists and technicians and welders. These are good, middle-class jobs -- you can call them blue-collar jobs -- that have been transformed into green-collar jobs. And, very importantly, they are accessible to a very broad range of workers as long as they get the right training and the right support."

A turbine tower is made from 100 tons of steel. Factory-made fiberglass blades and the steel rotor that turns them can weigh 40 tons. The fiberglass nacelle, a turbine's brain and heart containing the gearing, generator, and thousands of those component parts, can weigh 70 tons.

Three years ago, John Grabner, the President of Cardinal Fastener, grabbed a chance to supply wind turbine fasteners to a project developer when European fasteners proved unsatisfactory. Because the work was profitable for Cardinal, Grabner went after more. With wind's record 2009 installations, Cardinal grew its manufacturing jobs 67 percent last year. The photo accompanying this post was taken at Cardinal. Can you spot the leader of the free world in there?

"The wind industry is real," Grabner said, "and the turbine manufacturers are doing what they said they would do. They are homologating their supply chain." (Homologation is the entirely legal marriage of foreign turbine technology and domestically manufactured components. Walsh called it "insourcing.")

"When we talk about green jobs," Walsh said, "there's often a misconception about what these jobs are. These are not jobs that are somewhere out there in the sci-fi future. They are jobs that already exist but are geared toward green ends."

There are three basic reasons that Vestas, the world's largest manufacturer of turbines, wants to buy U.S.-made parts, Grabner said. They want to deal in dollars, they save 18 percent to 20 percent on transportation costs, and they want to build a domestic manufacturing base so the federal government will continue to support the renewables industries.

"It's like a ripple effect," Grabner said, explaining why he accepts the independent studies that show a national Renewable Electricity Standard (RES) will create 274,000 jobs.

"When we get an order for fasteners for a wind turbine, we call the steel mill, who gets hold of the iron ore mine. They do their job with the steel and send it to us via truck. We build it and send it to our outside service folks, who in turn heat, treat and plate it," Grabner explained. "Then it goes to the turbine manufacturer and then into the field."

That is the ripple effect for just one critical component used to attach tower segments, attach the nacelle to the tower, and attach the blades to the hub. As Walsh pointed out, a wind turbine has over 8,000 such components.

Once manufactured, parts are sent to assembly centers. Once assembled, the tower and nacelle must be transported to the installation site. Grabner said Cardinal regularly ships tons of fasteners via trucking companies. Walsh pointed out that towers and nacelles are often transported by rail. Blades are usually trucked. Such transport puts the domestic rail and trucking labor force to work.

At the installation site, it's a matter of boots on the ground. "Installing these turbines is a large construction project," Walsh said. "It's good for the economy."

Once the wind installation is producing electricity, operations personnel and maintenance workers must be onsite regularly, booting it up the towers to monitor and service gearboxes and generators.

"Building a green economy will involve some brand-new industries and jobs but, for the most part, it will involve transforming the industries and jobs we already have," Walsh said. A welder who once worked on submarines can become a welder of wind turbine towers. "Same skill set," Walsh said. "Very different economic ends."

"The culture in the manufacturing base has got to change," John Grabner said. "There is an opportunity there, but you've got to be in the right place at the right time with the right attitude to get it."

greentechmedia.com