SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Petz who wrote (39497)11/7/1997 9:01:00 PM
From: jackrabbit  Respond to of 186894
 
>>>> The contingent liability is as I reported, 6.5 million shares at $90 a share ($582,000,000). You are right that Intel did receive money for selling these put warrants ($190M), but its much less than the $582M which they will pay out if the price doesn't recover.<<<<<

Petz,

If your numbers are right, taking account of the premium, Intel breaks even at $60 per share. If the warrants expire worthless, as is likely, I believe the premium income is tax free to Intel, because companies don;t have to recognize revenue for sales of options on their own securities. Looks like a pretty smart move to me.

John



To: Petz who wrote (39497)11/8/1997 2:02:00 PM
From: Gary Kao  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Do you know WHEN those $90 strike price puts are exercisable? If so, perhaps this offers a sure way to make money. As you know, companies have ways (both ethical and unethical) to influence the stock price. Why couldn't Intel sudden announce "Good news!" just before the puts exercise date occurs to drive up the stock price so that perhaps the puts would expire worthless. The news could be as trivial as "bump in SE Asian CPU shipments" or "great yields" and given the pessimism rampant these days any good news could have a tremendous effect. I don't think such manipulation would bring a risk of lawsuits, as shareholders are NOT irate when the stock price goes up!

Gary