SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (264272)7/26/2010 11:54:22 PM
From: Smiling BobRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
June Home Sales SOARED 24%!!!
but....
May's number was revised downward to a rate of 267,000, the slowest pace on records dating back to 1963. Sales for April and March were also revised downward.

Are you really being too negative if you read the fine print rather than falling for the BS?

I worry more about those who get excited over the hype and those who disseminate and sell the lies. If the shysters see their deceitful tactics are working, they'll continue using them. The lies and scams are what's created this mess. Don't need to make it worse by further enabling.

The bigger the lie, the bigger the fall from grace



To: tejek who wrote (264272)7/26/2010 11:57:09 PM
From: THRead Replies (4) | Respond to of 306849
 
tejek,

If you think the unemployment rate is really as reported, well, that is really sad.

You are grossly mistaken. And if you bothered to read any of the countless articles and papers as to why this is, you would not make a fool of yourself defending a data point that is clearly flawed.

Or maybe you consider discouraged workers to NOT be unemployed. That is how they get the number that low.

Very solid data would indicate the true rate of unemployment is probably between 15-20%.

GET IT?

Doubtful.

GT
TH



To: tejek who wrote (264272)7/27/2010 12:12:14 AM
From: Pogeu MahoneRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 



To: tejek who wrote (264272)7/27/2010 4:58:43 PM
From: RetiredNowRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
LOL. Maybe so. But there's been a lot to be negative about recently.