Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (375604)	7/30/2010 5:02:19 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794328

I expect the MINIMUM to be spent on a Wedding present will be 1K. That's about a 1/2 million dollar haul for the couple.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (375604)	7/30/2010 6:26:10 AM
From: RinConRon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794328

Perhaps a precursor to Hillary's hat toss for 2012?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (375604)	7/30/2010 6:58:03 AM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Respond to of 794328

It's definitely noteworthy ... as is the President publicly remarking that he wasn't invited. There are two camps at the top of the Democratic party in an uneasy truce.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (375604)	7/30/2010 9:05:57 AM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794328

Maybe significant or maybe the bride didn't want to be upstaged by a sitting President. Kind of sucks the O2 from a room when POTUS walks in.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (375604)	7/30/2010 9:32:28 AM
From: SirWalterRalegh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794328

<<And that wedding party will NOT include Barack Obama. I understand he mentioned on the View that he wasn't invited. Isn't that extremely strange? The entire Democratic establishment will be there, the MOTB is the SoS, and the Prez isn't invited?>> Obama didn't want to be invited. He will be out playing golf which I have to agree is pretty astute.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (375604)	8/1/2010 12:54:02 AM
From: KLP	1 Recommendation Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 794328

How's this for a nightmare? Chelsea for President? Impossible? Think Again Ann Kane American Thinker July 31, 2010 Two nights ago, I had one of those half conscious dreams as I was drifting off to sleep. The thought and vision of Chelsea Clinton appeared in my mind's eye, and I said to myself, "She has been molded from birth in the ways of progressives. I bet she's being primed to become president someday." Then, Jeff Kuhner, columnist and media commentator, sitting in for Michael Savage last night, said practically the same thing when he played a tape of The Godfather movie, and put his own words into the script. Something like, "Hillary, there was no time to make you President, maybe there's time for Chelsea." Kuhner talked about one gangster family, the Clintons, marrying into another gangster family, the Mezvinskys. Marc Mezvinsky, Chelsea's new husband as of today, has a felon for a father, "Crazy Eddie." Chelsea used to work for a George Soros hedge fund, and Marc currently works at G3 Capital, a Manhattan hedge fund operation. A new chapter in dynasty control of a nation has revealed the not-so-strange bedfellows of a Soros-Clinton-Mezvinsky coalition. Hedge fund trading tops the list of ways to "get over" by the rich, elite and infamous, and people like Soros, who should have been in jail a long time ago, continue to weave their web of deceit to cheat honest, hard working people. All over the internet, progressive websites are touting the new "Royal Couple" as though everything's glorious because love is in the air. They may talk in pretty language, but this is not a royal wedding, this is a criminal enterprise gaining traction. Thus, in the name of what's good for the country, the possibility of Chelsea Clinton becoming president someday has to remain in the realm of mere possibility; it can never become a reality. Page Printed from: americanthinker.com at July 31, 2010 - 11:51:17 PM CDT