Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (24940)	11/8/1997 2:32:00 AM
From: Bob Jagow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Mush will nicely pass thru a 600-mesh screen.

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (24940)	11/8/1997 5:50:00 AM
From: HungryLion	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 35569

Larry, I don't think you know what the hell you are talking about. Your "objectivity" sure leaves a lot to be desired. It seems to me that you IPM bulls didn't mind too much with all of the manipulative hype that helped fuel a rising stock price. Why weren't you begging for Stauffer to leave? I find it amusing that the knowledgable experts like Charters and Tim Hall get ridiculed from know nothings like yourself. What exactly is your background in mining, Larry? As for Charters motives it is obvious if only you would bother to look. He warned PFG, DELGF, and NPA investors of impending doom. He supplied good arguments to back his opinion. The NPA bulls got him kicked off of SI because they had their own spiritual leader named Merle Goertz who is of the same ilk as the breathless CL Miltimore/Frank Stauffer. Charters was right on in all three cases. His track record is not of a random scare mongerer for the benefit of a short position. Obviously, this simple observation escapes you.

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (24940)	11/8/1997 6:02:00 AM
From: HungryLion	Respond to of 35569

Looks like the Behre Dolbear contract with IPM expired a couple of days ago (Nov 5, 1996 was a 12 month extension). I'm too lazy to examine the press releases again so I'll let one of you self proclaimed mining experts correct if I wrong. If salting took place we can expect to see no more mention of new work from BD in the future now that they aren't under contract. I guess Bateman is now the new worm on the hook to bait you with the promise of a BIG report. Speaking of oddities, why do you suppose it has taken so long for BD to lists its clients on its webpage. I thought they would be eager as heck to proudly list IPM and Naxos.