Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (2032)	11/8/1997 3:21:00 AM
From: Investor A	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6843

Ali, I have done the benchmarks on PMMX and MX with and w/o L2 cache exchange2000.com exchange2000.com exchange2000.com From your benchmarks, PII has weak memory subsystem just like Pentium/PMMX. Intel illegally copied lots of DEC Alpha-related patents and concepts. Does Alpha have relative slow memory subsystem (when comparing to Cyrix 6x86 or K6)?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (2032)	11/8/1997 2:51:00 PM
From: Investor A	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6843

Ali, Visit Anand Hardward page and go to PII report under REVIEWS - CPU. anand.iserver.net By Anand Winstone97 benchmark and your results on the cacheless PII, a L2 cacheless Pentium II 266Mhz is just as fast as PII-166 w/512K on the same motherboard by taking off 21% of PII-266 Winstone rating. By comparing, a L2 cacheless Pentium II 266Mhz might be just as fast as Gateway 2000 PMMX-200Mhz if GTW does not eliminate the 512K L2 cache. After shrunk to .25u, Intel will have a tinny die size on PII. In order to move the whole market to SLOT 1/2 or S**T 1, the cache free PII for sub-$1,000 market makes sense. Never under-estimate Intel marketing magic. They are the best of the best! Fuchi ... who loves Cyrix's innovations Please support the PC industry & protect consumer interest techstocks.com