SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gary Kao who wrote (39616)11/8/1997 3:40:00 PM
From: StockMan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
FYI, more news on bifurcation

news.com

While Intel discussed incorporating more graphics and audio functionality into its chip sets, the company specifically stated it would not follow the "system on a chip" strategy pioneered by Cyrix, in which graphics and other functions are hardwired to the main processor.

Intel said it doesn't like the strategy because processor advancements happen at a different pace than advancements in graphics, which in turn forces all segments to follow the lowest common denominator.


Also see my posts a few weeks ago on this system on a chip thing.
The similarities are remarkable. Glag that Intel agrees with me :) :)
It must mean they are doing something right!!

www4.techstocks.com

The general purpose nature of the CPU is lost (and as you have correctly pointed out, upgrading functionality) if MediaGX type functions are added. It also fragments the CPU's and this involves, different manufacturing and marketing issues.

Stockman



To: Gary Kao who wrote (39616)11/8/1997 4:02:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Gary - Re: "For example, Cyrix dumped their chips at cost to clear out inventory"

That may have had a minor impact - the dumping of the M1/6x86 was on the order of 1,000,000 chips and Cyrix's M2/6x86MX were only a few hundred thousand.

Paul