Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockMan who wrote (25697)	11/8/1997 7:51:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579130

StockMan - Re: "Also the overclocked pmmx puts k6/233 to shame, no increase in power?" That's why AMD has to charge 25% less than an Intel Pentium MMX for their K6. Or expressed differently, that's why Intel can sell their Pentium MMX for 25% more than the AMD K6 - and get it! Paul

To: StockMan who wrote (25697)	11/8/1997 8:15:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579130

Paul Stockman, <overclocked pmmx puts k6/233 to shame> You are shameless bashers with little brains. Check this survey out and see who is who: sysopt.com You will not find any P5MMX (in any overclocked flavour) even close to the top 20 performers, where K6 and M2 share positions with P-II/266. Paul, you were bashing the Uberclockmeister Tom for overclocking practice with K6. Now you are singing hymns to overclocked Pentium. So what is your real position? Or do you just receive new directives from Intel marketing department, or what?