SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : S3 (A LONGER TERM PERSPECTIVE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Leo Francis who wrote (7615)11/8/1997 5:57:00 PM
From: Tom Terf  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14577
 
Director's insurance is capped at about $ 4-5M, max.
But some of this money will be used too pay personal
legal bills of the individual directors as necessary.

S3 has not purchased insurance for an unlimited
exposure.

Normally settlements tend to made at the nominal maximum
$ 5M insurance level plus if the Company is really guilt
like S3, then they may have to kick in a further $ 5 - 10M
Also, the lawyers may try to recover some of Gary Johnson's
stock gains.. and other Board members and S3 employees who
sold their shares while knowledgeable of the scheme.
This is where the SEC gets involved, if they do here.

So you have about $ 10-15M before lawyers fees
to spread around. Assuming average loss is $7 x 50M shares
you'll get no more than 5 % of the loss recovered.

The numbers are all the same. This has happened before.

Forget it .. it's pocket change relative to what you actually
lost !