SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (581031)8/14/2010 5:09:18 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578594
 
They got to the point where they may be able to destabilize Pakistan.

Right. Blame it on Bush, not his incompetent successor who could have changed the policy and has chosen to stick with the same policy Bush was employing.

I don't know if Pakistan is unstable, but if it is, it is because of Obama, not Bush.

In case you haven't noticed, the incompetent bastard has been in the WH approaching two years. You can't keep blaming Bush for everything into perpetuity. At some point, the failed president YOU put in office has to be held responsible.

While I know YOU will never admit you made a mistake, most Americans today know they totally f*cked up. Which is why the Gallup tracking poll shows Obama further upside down than ever before.



To: combjelly who wrote (581031)8/15/2010 11:07:28 AM
From: d[-_-]b  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578594
 
It is a real problem. One that might not have a solution now.

It never did and why Bush was wise to keep our presence lower in Afghanistan - that place really is a quagmire.

We are funding the taliban through pakistan - we barely had the money, time and skills to get Iraq moving in the right direction - no one on earth has enough money to fix afghanistan and pakistan - they don't want our help - just our money.