Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (65404)	8/15/2010 3:19:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217734

Tobacco Jack... tibet is an integral part of china, much more so than california is of usa. tibet issue was, i believe, settled on this thread, Just because you "claim" that it's settled, doesn't make it a fact. The FACTS ARE that the Tibetan people don't speak Chinese. They don't look Chinese. They don't share the same cultural background as the Chinese. Yet, you assert that Tibet is an integral part of China. But that's far from the reality. en.wikipedia.org So don't try and convince us that China doesn't engage in Imperialistic conquest. After all, for most of their history they've had various emperors. And Emperors rule Empires. And Empires are built by conquering your neighbors. Btw, I noticed that you quickly decided to avoid addressing the issue of the Triads and their international narcotics smuggling, as well as China's history (past and current) of enslavement of other human beings. Bottom line, the Chinese are not the "victims" of history that you fruitlessly attempt to purvey. I mean.. the next you'll try and convince us of is that the Spratly's are an integral part of China.. Then Vietnam.. Then Burma, then Cambodia.. etc, etc.. Hawk