Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (65408)	8/15/2010 3:43:32 AM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217736

so, you are in favor of a popular universal suffrage vote in tibet ? or instead, are you ready to vacate n.america? i am ok with either determination n would on to a program to advocate. you see, issue settled.

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (65408)	8/15/2010 3:58:28 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217736

<<Btw, I noticed that you quickly decided to avoid addressing the issue of the Triads and their international narcotics smuggling as well as China's history (past and current) of enslavement of other human beings.>> i am not avoiding the issues, because it is inane, given that triads and analogue organizations are everywhere and comprised of all peoples, whereas opium shipment to china in history and western slave trade were state-sponsored terrorism. trust even one such as you do see the sordid difference. <<Bottom line, the Chinese are not the "victims" of history that you fruitlessly attempt to purvey>> ... am unsure what gave you the idea that that be where i was coming from and angling to go. seek truth by looking back on the thread, and know that i was merely and just answering your inane questions set as alledged truths. <<The FACTS ARE that the Tibetan people don't speak Chinese. They don't look Chinese. They don't share the same cultural background as the Chinese. Yet, you assert that Tibet is an integral part of China.>> ... them be your criteria? funny, especially when i think of miami. on tibet, for your illumination, the entire dalai lama schema originated from beijing, and the schema ran rogue, was brought back into the fold, per contract. re spratly's, yes, once was and shall again be. i wager you. and if not, so goes guam, saipan, hawaii, which might well be the case as the sequence of collapse devolves per script. it not be what i either look forward to or relish, but am figuring a matter of course, natural, inevitable, a given, in alignment with the force. for that matter, miami, florida, texas. re vietnam, burma, cambodia, definitely not, and i am unaware of any claims contrary, although i do seem to remember team usa tried to conguer vietnam as well as cambodia, and killed a whole lot of women and children, by your comrades perhaps, using chemical weapons yet. do you have any more inane points, and have you reconciled to the truth that you have been so very wrong since i have known you, on macro economics as well as geopolitics? does the truth hurt that much?