Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (90248)	9/2/2010 11:32:45 AM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224704

Then, older and disabled people will become my clients.

To: tonto who wrote (90248)	9/2/2010 11:38:10 AM
From: chartseer	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224704

I thought with obamacare everyone would pay the same fees. comrade chartseer

To: tonto who wrote (90248)	9/2/2010 11:52:12 AM
From: Justin C	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224704

With obamacare and the increased health costs, I will only hire young healthy people in the future as their costs will be much less. John Stossel has a report showing that apparently you're not alone, tonto. Here's an excerpt: The ADA was supposed to help more disabled people find jobs. But did it? Strangely, no. An MIT study found that employment of disabled men ages 21 to 58 declined after the ADA went into effect. Same for women ages 21 to 39. How could employment among the disabled have declined? Because the law turns "protected" people into potential lawsuits. Most ADA litigation occurs when an employee is fired, so the safest way to avoid those costs is not to hire the disabled in the first place. foxnews.com