SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeroen Pluimers who wrote (39720)11/9/1997 11:58:00 PM
From: carl a. mehr  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jeroen,
This bug sounds like GARBAGE to me. Even Intel's most severe critic Robert Collins seems to say so in the article referenced at 39711.

The following two paragraphs (lifted from the article):

Collins said that someone must have malicious intent for the bug to actually wreak havoc, making it different than past Pentium and Pentium Pro bugs.

The bug is a single illegal instruction and not something that would be deliberately coded into a software program, according to Collins. Therefore, it will not be found in commercial software or independently developed software.


Good luck to you short sellers, as you are about to get fried! Your phony bug story will not fly!

Best wishes (and if you are short, you better run for cover),
humbler carl



To: Jeroen Pluimers who wrote (39720)11/10/1997 1:07:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jeroen - Re: "Pentium F0 0F Bug"

I use Microsoft Windows 95.

It occasionally locks up my computer.

This happens to nearly everybody I assume - about 50,000,000 people.

Are we ALL entitled to get our money back from Microsoft?

Paul