SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (273614)9/6/2010 10:32:32 AM
From: joseffyRespond to of 306849
 
Washington Post on Michelle Obama: 'So Many Eye Her With Awe and Disbelief'

By Tim Graham Fri, 06/19/2009
newsbusters.org

The Washington Post’s Robin Givhan goes all gooey for Michelle Obama again at the top of the Style section on Friday, comparing the First Lady to Clair Huxtable, or as explained by the caption under their pictures: "As portrayed by Phylicia Rashad, Clair Huxtable was an accomplished yet down-to-earth figure. In Michelle Obama, the nation now has another symbol of success and style." Givhan writes with an admiration so dazzled that you worry she’s going to faint:

. . .

The Post and Givhan also seem unaware of how this gooey prose about Michelle's perfection can really sound like the mandated meringues of a state-run newspaper in a airless dictatorship.



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (273614)9/6/2010 10:39:50 AM
From: The ReaperRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
Officials said this infrastructure package differs from the stimulus because it's aimed at long-term growth, while still focusing on creating jobs in the short-term.

That's exactly how they sold us the $787B stimulus bill. I wonder if 8% of these funds will actually go to infrastructure like the last package and the rest to institutions like the now name-changed ACORN. These guys are either liars or incompetent or more likely both.



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (273614)9/6/2010 12:05:04 PM
From: joseffyRespond to of 306849
 
Obama Administration Calls Unions a Human Right in U.N. Report and Refers to 'Card Check' Legislation
______________________________________________________________
Monday, September 6, 2010
bluegrasspundit.com

Among the tidbits buried in the first Universal Periodic Review (UPR) report of U.S. Human Rights issues was the section excerpted (starting on page 6) below. The Obama administration has declared unionization a human right and indirectly equated it to freedom of speech, freedom of religion and other normal human rights.

23. Freedom of association also protects workers and their right to organize. The labor movement in the United States has a rich history, and the right to organize and bargain collectively under the protection of the law is the bedrock upon which workers are able to form or join a labor union. Workers regularly use legal mechanisms to address complaints such as threats, discharges, interrogations, surveillance, and wages-and-benefits cuts for supporting a union. These legal regimes are continuously assessed and evolving in order to keep pace with a modern work environment. Our UPR consultations included workers from a variety of sectors, including domestic workers who spoke about the challenges they face in organizing effectively. Currently there are several bills in our Congress that seek to strengthen workers’ rights—ensuring that workers can continue to associate freely, organize, and practice collective bargaining as the U.S. economy continues to change.

Making it very easy for unions to organize workers is now a stated U.S human Rights goal. The primary bill among the 'several bills' the Obama administration is referring to is the ironically named Employee Free Choice Act which is commonly called 'Card Check.' This bill does away with secret ballot elections for unionization. When a union gets over 50% cards signed, they have won. There is no election. Supporters of the bill claim it still allows an election to be called when 30% have signed cards (same as current law), but only the union doing the organizing can petition for an election. Anti-union workers and businesses don't have that right. Unions normally don't call elections now until they have at least 60% cards signed because many people will sign a card, but vote no during the secret ballot election. Unionization elections will be a thing of the past if this bill passes. 'Card Check' has already passed the House and is pending in the Senate.

Shamefully, stripping workers of their right to a secret ballot vote is now a stated U.S. Human rights goal.



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (273614)9/6/2010 12:46:22 PM
From: CalculatedRiskRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Perhaps you've forgotten that one of the arguments against the "shovel ready" stimulus was that the money would arrive too late, and the economy would already be recovering.

I thought that was wrong then - and I thought even more infrastructure spending made sense. I support this proposal (or course what the money is spent on matters too).



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (273614)9/7/2010 7:09:33 AM
From: yard_manRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
actually got a little bit of the first wad here -- some signs on the highway -- also the community college got some