Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (46160)	9/24/2010 7:00:21 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 71588

My point is simply that in countries that muslims control the dhimi is often imposed on Christians and other non muslim citizens. Churches cannot be built nor can major maintenance be performed. Christians are treated as third class citizens in most muslim nations. My reference to Saudi Aribia, the host of islam's "most holy" site, is fairly equivalent to the Vatican being Christiandom's most holy site. They are not the same, but they are similar. If Italy started taxing muslims 10% for not being Catholic and imposed similar restrictions as Saudi Arabia imposes on Christians there would be hell to pay all over the world. Why should we allow them to maintain a double standard. When they support the building of terrorist indoctrination facilities in the US we should impose the same kind of restrictions on those facilities that they impose on Christian indoctrination facilities. I understand that Sunni's and Shite and not Wahabi. Regardless, the top donor to virtually every major Western indoctrination facility is Saudi Arabia. When they allow Bibles, then we should allow the koran. Their profit told them to make truces when they don't have an advantage and then war when to do have the advantage. This is not a religion as much as a cult of domination.