Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (46184)	9/25/2010 12:34:17 AM
From: Big Black Swan	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 71588

Your analysis is way too rational and based overly much on the facts. Better watch it, could be contagious.

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (46184)	9/26/2010 2:35:34 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 71588

Re: "Regardless, the top donor to virtually every major Western indoctrination facility is Saudi Arabia." That is because W'habbism was born on the Arabian peninsula and receives official funding from the Saudi state (the Royals). Essentially, a googly portion of the money we pay them for their oil gets turned to promote and proselytize and fund and support radical Sunni W'habbist teachings and practices around the world.

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (46184)	9/27/2010 8:20:30 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

There should be more protest at their policies like extra taxes based on religion, disallowing church building, etc. But we shouldn't sink to their level and try to impose similar policies ourselves. Why should we allow them to maintain a double standard. Imposing a similar double standard here, would not mean we get to avoid allowing them to maintain a double standard. Actually trying to force them to drop the double standard would involved some rather questionable policies. Economic sanctions, probably would not be joined in by the rest of the world, and would tend to tilt more of the Arab people and governments against us, while being ineffective. Invasion would be rather costly to say the least. Bombing one country until it caves, and then threatening the next? Well I suppose you could do that but you would have to kill a lot of people to force change. We allow a double standard because its their country, and they get to make the rules there. Also because trying to not allow it probably either won't work, or will cause tremendous harm, or both.