Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (66462)	9/25/2010 3:55:48 AM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219918

<<Referring to US soldiers as "baby-killers".. Is it really worth answering such a ludicrous and indefensible position? ... Show me where it's currently "official policy" to target and kill non-combatant women and children.>> ... hamoon, you choose your word perhaps a bit too obviously. the current official policy would naturally come to light in due time, a bit late, as usual and always to do the current victims of such policy any good. but, just to drive a point easily home, the current policy is to invade afghanistan. yes? the current policy is to transgress in pakistan, just as team usa once transgressed in cambodia. yes? pakistan is just about to become a failed state as cambodia was made to fail. yes? team usa munitions are killing women and children on both sides of the pakistani / afghanistan bordere, after secretive and deliberate and high precision targeting and therefore presumably well done aqnd sanctioned duty. yes? usa troops who participated in deliberate murder and rape in iraq have mostly gotten off quite well, just like the brave troopers at malai. yes? i rest my case. yours? start spinning. re team usa prisoner of war death during winter in n.e.asia during the korean war, the weather had everything to do with the outcome, as team usa deliberately chose of free will to try to engage china at one of china's weakest moment. china could not even provide housing for own population much less fight a war. china fought back, rest is history. and same again in vietnam, and rest is again history. in relation to the korean war, what the chinese troops did not do, as the team usa troops did as a matter of official policy, shoot defenseless civilians under the bridges enmass. do you have an explanation now that the truth has once again come to inevitable light google.com in asia we do not actually believe invaders should be afforded hotel treatment when there are no hotels available. events would have been different had there been hotels as there are plenty today near the china/n.korean border. whatever you contend, you cannot get away from one central truth, that usa soldiers are everywhere, and mostly uninvited and unwelcomed except by puppets, i.e. invaders. to rest on the laurels of world war ii is just so like you, and those ignorant of the constitution, mouthing off about the founding fathers. the founding fathers did mention "no foreign entanglement". you do remember, do you? mathematical fact by defense spend, that team usa is the most enthusiastic sponsor of death on this planet bar none, and that is simply a matter of math. why deny it?