SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92030)10/1/2010 10:50:08 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224713
 
I wonder if I can get a waiver on the taxes associated with obamacare.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92030)10/1/2010 10:50:40 AM
From: Carolyn2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224713
 
Gee, is that fair to all the other companies out there?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92030)10/1/2010 10:51:16 AM
From: Carolyn3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224713
 
Kenneth, how do you explain this?

Medicare Advantage Plans Eliminated for 3 Million Seniors
by Connie Hair
09/29/2010

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) have made a capricious decision to eliminate certain Medicare Advantage drug plans affecting up to three million seniors—automatically enrolling more than 1.5 million seniors in a new plan that will cost them 15% more in premiums alone.

Other changes made by CMS will cause premium rate increases for Medicare Advantage plans ranging from 10-45%.
House Ways and Means Ranking Republican Dave Camp (R-Mich.) and Health Subcommittee Ranking Republican Wally Herger (R-Calif.) yesterday wrote Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius demanding answers and warning the administration’s plans would cause further confusion for America’s seniors.

From the letter:

Avalere, a leading health care research firm, predicts that because of CMS’ actions, more than 3 million seniors will be forced out of their current Medicare prescription drug plan.
The impact, for many seniors, will be higher monthly premiums for Part D coverage. For example, CMS has arbitrarily decided to shut down the second most popular prescription drug plan, AARP MedicareRx Saver, which currently enrolls more than 1.5 million Medicare beneficiaries. To “mitigate” this harm, CMS intends to automatically enroll effected seniors into a drug plan whose premiums are 15 percent higher than the plan terminated by CMS. CMS is also terminating the eighth most popular plan that currently enrolls nearly one-half million Medicare beneficiaries.

All told, Avalere predicts monthly premiums for the top 10 Part D plans, which cover 7 in 10 Part D enrollees, will increase by 10 percent next year. Avalere noted that one plan, which currently has nearly 600,000 enrollees, will increase its premiums by nearly 45 percent (from less than $64 per month to nearly $91 per month) in part because of CMS’ decision to terminate drug plans.

The Deputy Director of the division that regulates Part D plans counters that seniors who will be harmed because of CMS’s actions will simply enroll in a lower cost plan. However, this statement directly contradicts CMS’ decision to automatically enroll more than 1.5 million current enrollees of AARP MedicareRX plan into a more costly plan.

Camp and Herger also demanded “CMS immediately provide all documents and correspondence related to CMS’ decision to eliminate prescription drug plans over the last two years, including any analysis that was conducted to determine the impact such decisions would have on premiums of displaced beneficiaries so that Congress can consider how best to protect seniors from such decisions in the future."

In yet another example of the Obamacare body slam to America’s seniors, the Boston Globe reports Harvard Pilgrim Health Care has notified customers that it will drop its Medicare Advantage health insurance program at the end of the year, forcing 22,000 senior citizens in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Maine to seek alternative supplemental coverage.

So much for the Democrats' promise, “If you like your insurance you can keep it.”

But most of us never believed them in the first place.

humanevents.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92030)10/1/2010 10:59:54 AM
From: TideGlider2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224713
 
The will waive everyone soon...right? lol What a joke. Muslims were waived from the beginning. Another sour joke. Obama is leading the country to ruin.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92030)10/1/2010 11:00:15 AM
From: Sedohr Nod5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224713
 
Why do they need a waiver, Kenny? I thought it was going to lower costs, get democrats elected eternally, clean out the ghettos and make flowers bloom in the desert.....as necessary as oxygen itself....I'm confused.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (92030)10/1/2010 11:02:40 AM
From: lorne2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224713
 
ken..."Jake, the federal government has granted McDonald's a waiver. Did you know that?"....

So it is obvious that a waiver will have to be granted to ALL American companies?

Wonder if waivers would still be required if hussein and other law makers had read the beast before making it law?

So if hussein grants a waiver does this mean the beast must be repealed? because it is just plain stupid?