SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : JAB International (JABI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: D.McQ who wrote (1079)11/10/1997 6:05:00 PM
From: Mr. Miller  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4571
 
Darlene, so refreshing to hear from you. I am glad that there is at least one other person on this thread who (in writing) agrees with me on two fundamental points right now: we are waiting for ANNOUNCEMENT of a JV partner and ANNOUNCEMENT of production numbers. That is it, plain and simple. I really look forward to your posts, since they seem sincere and knowledgeable. I noticed you have mostly posted here. Glad to have you.
Charger, I already said I got through and left message for written info that is so hard to read on the "unofficial" web site. I never got a return call.
I fail to see how $150/.3oz.gold is the industry standard. I will go back and check that, but common sense tells me that that would be over$450/1oz. gold and that would not be profitable right now. My source tells me more like $250-$350/1 oz.gold.
I was following volume increase beginning around 2:10EST, and noticed we went from 500,000 up to that point in the day to the close of over 1.1 million. We traded 500,000+ in the last 1 1/2 hours of the day. This is what I call anticipation for news after the closing bell. None so far. Obviously we hit the 1 1/2 brick wall again, and we will keep hitting it till someone is able to buy enough to push us through, or investors begin to think we SHOULD bust through. There are just too many sells at that point right now.
I am not discouraged by the drop today. It can't go up every day. I'm sure we will see more down days in the future, but don't get too used to it. My hope is that we will continue a net rise in there somewhere. GO BCMD!!

Miller



To: D.McQ who wrote (1079)11/10/1997 10:56:00 PM
From: Jeffery E. Forrest  Respond to of 4571
 
Darlene, I don't think anyone here was looking at Chandefleur as a trading/investment vehicle.

I got the impression that the original CYJ question was asked because of the close proximity it has to BCMD.

Seems to me that CJY is taking BCMD's claims VERY seriously if they are increasing their exploration efforts because of what BCMD found.

I would take this as a strong indicator that BCMD has found substantial amounts of gold.

Why?
1. The company has vested interests in telling us good news.

2. Other BCMD investors are also biased to one degree or another when reporting on what they see when visiting the mine.

3. Cambridge and others like it would also have these same vested interests.

-CYJ, on the other hand, is the most unbiased indicator I've seen yet that tells me BCMD has found good things.
If they are getting this excited by what their neighbor has found, well...........................



To: D.McQ who wrote (1079)11/11/1997 4:12:00 AM
From: Patrick Ives  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 4571
 
Darlene,
I did not make a post on the BCMD's thread to debate the merits of CYJ. If you read my post carefully I just simply referred Brian to the CYJ thread as he asked a question about CYJ's location. There is no doubt that BCMD is further along in their program than CYJ but to say CYJ is riskiest of risk stocks is to be very naive. You claim to be knowlegable about this area but if so you would know that this area has a very rich history in gold mining and I am sure BCMD will not be the only success story in the area. As far as CYJ investors not welcoming input from BCMD investors on the CYJ thread that is a silly comment as the more ink this area gets the better it will be for all investors. The best scenario possible for the shareholders of BCMD, 16 to 1 and CYJ is that all of these companies are very successful and draw the attention of new investors. CYJ's exploration program is moving along nicely, thank you very much, and I am sure we will all benefit from their successes.
Pat



To: D.McQ who wrote (1079)11/11/1997 5:12:00 PM
From: Milk  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4571
 
Darlene, Another low volume day. Do you know by any chance when BCMD
plans to make another announcement? Looks like the stock may continue shedding 1/32's on low vol/no news this week.
The stock may have also been affected by another decline in AU prices to 310.8.