Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John who wrote (39192)	10/7/2010 12:38:26 PM
From: Cage Rattler	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 103300

I understand your point and appreciate your position, " I respectfully disagree with using this as an analogy to the first amendment argument." O.K. Yes, the example was beyond reasonable; but, that was the intent -- to illustrate the logical weakness using a parallel extreme. It could be worse, how about necrophilia not being a crime because there is no injured party? :^) Perhaps your position is subtly sidling toward the PC rather than embracing the inherently evil nature of the behavior? Any issue such as we see here, demonstrating at a funeral, is so obviously wrong that that should be an a priori legal assumption as with my necrophilia example. Of course it is impossible to draw an objective legal line given subjective issues. This is one more of those unsolvable conundrum that sends everyone running in circles. Now running in circles is fun for those paid by the hour. Follow the money trail... and at trails end we find self-serving lawyers who profit from arguing either side of one more bogus issue.