Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : QDRX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: strtrset who wrote (3078)	11/11/1997 1:41:00 AM
From: Cavewoman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3977

At the Annual Stockholders meeting, I think Jim got a feel about how the stockholders feel about a reverse split. I also got a feel about how Jim felt about it. He didn't want it. I think he knows the stockholders don't want one. We all are aware that it can be a killer. I would rather see any profit from Victor used to buy back stock. If that is possible. We have to hope, with the hockey season upon us that the license agreements with the AHL and the NHL are forthcomming and the players who like the product can take the tape off the sticks that hide the name. Also, that TM will sign a deal and the stockholders are willing to support all the effort that is being made here. I agree, QDRX is not the name that will be promoted. QDRX will become the supplyer to the most advanced sports equipment on the market for the future. I've seen this stuff. It's great and we need to put our support behind the people who are trying to make a market for it. I know that in the supplyer market, the supplyer sometimes has to take a back seat to the big name. Who supplies the chemicals to Coke a Cola? Big name? No, but I bet they are doing ok. Ginger/only a Cavewoman

To: strtrset who wrote (3078)	11/11/1997 2:01:00 PM
From: J. Davies	Respond to of 3977

"Douglas" - >The 10Q coming out Thursday will be a loss per share but improved over last quarter by a slight amount< I should hope there will be less loss per share - there are 10,000,000 more shares to dilute the losses into - I interpret your words to say that total losses are bigger >I am a little confused by the cash flow problem Ms. Davies presents-would like claification< Brother John's paragraph is confusing - is he talking about a cash flow to Quadrax corporate over the six month period - in other words a management fee? JD