Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (9398)	11/2/2010 1:23:49 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

Only the most radically doctrinaire atheists would deny that effects MUST have a cause and have the nerve to character that concept as "plucked out of thin air". OTOH: that is a very good description of atheistic ethics. "In short, the explanatory value of an arbitrary, plucked-out-of-thin-air idea of a designer to “explain” the universe and the complexity of life in it is null, vacuous, empty."

To: Solon who wrote (9398)	11/2/2010 5:10:32 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

<that biological systems are too complex to have evolved naturally, > Gefaw!... except that you can OBSERVE it in a pitri dish. <Only the most radically doctrinaire atheists would deny that effects MUST have a cause > I like this one... HUH!?? It's the mechanistic (stuck in Newton's model) reductionists thast CLAIM (not deny) you need a cause... Modern physics states that "things happen when conditions are right". There are "preconditions", but using a larger context no one cause. Where does PopeGreg get this stuf??? DAK