Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scion who wrote (2876)	11/7/2010 2:23:32 PM
From: scion	Respond to of 53574

The feeling I got was one of frustration waiting for the DEC. One story John told was of the DEC calling and asking about them burning plastic. He kept telling them that the process does not burn plastic, but because they have never seen the process they kept asking. And they said they didn't have the budget to actually make a house call to check it out. Re: My visit to the P2O factory today... techisbest Today at 10:20 am Waikikian wrote: You must have gotten some feel for timeline after being there and talking to John. The feeling I got was one of frustration waiting for the DEC. One story John told was of the DEC calling and asking about them burning plastic. He kept telling them that the process does not burn plastic, but because they have never seen the process they kept asking. And they said they didn't have the budget to actually make a house call to check it out. I guess that it was Conestoga-Rovers & Associates (“CRA”) that did the stack test and the results were passed along to the DEC via the application. So I guess the DEC has never seen the facility themselves. Sorry, no bleachers. Everybody is hoping that the DEC is able to move forward faster now that the elections are not getting in the way. If you're frustrated, join the club. jbii.user-board.net

To: scion who wrote (2876)	11/7/2010 2:51:17 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53574

Yes, John told me that directly. I already posted this from an email John sent me on 9/27: techisbest Share Sunday, November 07, 2010 2:43:27 PM Re: PaperProphet post# 75604 Post # of 75632 Quote: Re:<"JBII will not, initially, be selling its diesel for running in an engine. There are plenty of other industrial uses (think boilers and furnaces with fuel atomizers) for their diesel."> Is that the official word from Mr. Bordynuik? So far there hasn't been any official announcement on how the "near diesel" will be sold or even what additive will be added to make it saleable. Did he tell you that directly? Yes, John told me that directly. I already posted this from an email John sent me on 9/27: Quote: I suggest shareholders contact the EPA to get straight answers to refute any misinformation campaign. The environmental agencies have been very supportive of our technology. They allowed us to build our proprietary process (large scale) with the existing air permits and stack at the factory. They further allowed us to run to test, run steady state, test, and rerun to iron out any bugs (with a temporary permit issued in hours). Further, the environmental agencies have reviewed the technology and allowed it to run through a stack test to gather data for a commercial permit. The stack test results proved the machine does not pollute. It's 100% stupidity that the EPA would hold up fuel sales and exports knowing that our fuel has less sulphur in it than fuel at the pump, that they have been very flexible with us to prove our technology is clean and works. I do not need EPA registration to sell fuel. I do not understand the emphasis to sell fuel for cars in the US. Like everything else, due to our clean fuel and size of our company, it would not be a problem but why spend any time on that now when there is plenty of low hanging fruit ( ie: factories, rail, ships, thousands of farms all of whom consume vast amounts of diesel and other fuels), all of Canada, and any ship that sails by in the Great Lakes. Then, consider international ships, generators, and thousands of factories. I suspect that if EPA registration of our fuel is critical to some people then maybe they somehow believe we will saturate the world market with diesel so much so that we would have nowhere left to sell it but to vehicles operated exclusively in the United States. siliconinvestor.com