Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fastpathguru who wrote (264913)	11/8/2010 11:44:15 AM
From: Elmer Phud	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Starting what? Where is what the start of that arrow represents defined? It also shows Magny Cours "starting" at the beginning of 2010, yet it didn't hit the market until the very end of Q1. Given that there is no definitive interpretation of that slide, what you're really trying to do is get everyone to accept your interpretation. As if on queue you miss the point completely but nevertheless, you are conceding that it shows BullDozer starting something in 2010. That was my point. Giving AMD every benefit of the doubt, lets assume it means starting production wafers, otherwise they would have put 200X in the slide. That assumption works for the Mangy Corpse example you used. Production wafers starting at the beginning of 2010(your example) with product introduction end of Q1. Either way the slide shows SOMETHING starting in 2010 for BullDozer, which is simply what I pointed out, and you are agreeing with me. CJ denied it said anything at all about 2010 and I made the whole thing up. You are #5 who can see it and only CJ can not. Without the benefit of hindsight, the AMD side could very well be touting that slide as evidence BD would be released in 2010, and you'd be claiming it isn't... And again, anyone claiming something definitive about that slide would be wrong. Again, 2010. Thank you. You are reinforcing my point here. I've made my point. I think we should drop this. Obviously CJ is in a complete state of denial and further embarrassment would serve no purpose.