Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (9771)	11/12/2010 8:02:22 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

The designation of three nucleic bases as a codon is not a chemical reaction. Again to code thesis....if I take 5-10 chemical elements I can arrange them to produce 100's of different compounds and no ID was needed.... If a chemist took chemical elements and arranges them into various compounds that IS intelligent design. The chemist is the intelligent actor there. .why would one be needed for the genetic "code". Because its a code! Something is designated as signifying something else .... not as a result of a physical, chemical, biological law. Just like "B" denotes (stands for) a particular sound, a particular codon denotes (stands for) a particular amino acid or the message "STOP".