Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (594120)	11/23/2010 12:40:54 PM
From: Alighieri	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1580436

Al, the WSJ is quoting a "study" by a group funded in part (48% to be precise) by federal and state governments. Of course they're going to count every job that was affected by the bailout as a job "created or saved." Right...the old "dismiss the carrier" argument...you know better, right, because you are, what? A follower of the industry...an expert on the topic...why pray tell should we take your word on this? Nevertheless, my WAG is that no more than 200,000 jobs would have been lost. Maybe you should write a paper on the subject and send it to the WSJ, eh? You people are deranged...this man could lift atlantis from the bottom of the sea and you'd all say that it was gonna float on its own anyway and he shouldn't have used the navy to help. Al