Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (10514)	12/6/2010 7:05:25 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

"I countered that the woman is given a choice both before and after the pregnancy, but the fetus has none at either time." The woman has a choice before, after, and DURING the pregnancy. What the writer said was true. Stating the woman had a choice before and after pregnancy doesn't mean she doesn't have one during pregnancy. The implication was your own. And he was right about the fetus too, it isn't able to exercise a choice at all. "it is certainly not a constitutional right." It is infinitely beyond the reach of all constitutions. It is not a constitutional right under the US constitution. Simply a statement of fact. But stating facts contrary to liberal opinion is heresy it seems. Abortion and gay sex are holy rites for liberals these days. "The message society is sending today is that it is okay to live irresponsibly and treat unborn life as cheap when it is an inconvenience" That is pure unadulterated crap and distortion and outright skewing! Yes, modern society communicates that message in innumerable ways. Its the problem liberals have with responsibility. but for prospective mothers and their doctors and their families it is a solemn and usually heart wrenching experience to lose or to give up your fetus. It may be for mothers and families, but doctors? Not likely. "I think this must be terribly confusing for his daughter." I think so, too. I have to suspect the story is contrived or disfigured or twisted or distorted. No reason to think that. Some people think that way .... the current US President uttered a similar opinion in public. "losing many years I could have been using being a positive force in society" Insulting and ignorant bastard!! So much for anyone even attempting to respect his little spew under his (now proven) pretense of being rational and objective!!! That was a mature sentimenet on his part. I can understand why it would bother you.